<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why chicks don&#8217;t dig porn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.northbynorthwestern.com/2007/01/1340/why-chicks-dont-dig-porn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.northbynorthwestern.com/2007/01/1340/why-chicks-dont-dig-porn/</link>
	<description>A daily newsmagazine of campus and culture for Northwestern University.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:43:26 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BloodSugar</title>
		<link>http://www.northbynorthwestern.com/2007/01/1340/why-chicks-dont-dig-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-116107</link>
		<dc:creator>BloodSugar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 16:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northbynorthwestern.com/2007/01/1340/why-chicks-dont-dig-porn/#comment-116107</guid>
		<description>It makes little to no sense to me why so many women say that &quot;porn is disgusting&quot;, nasty etc. I&#039;m a woman and I don&#039;t hate porn. Furthermore, I kind of like watching it. It&#039;s just sex, albeit graphic, and that&#039;s it. Unless you&#039;re a prude or a nun I don&#039;t see why you should follow the cliche &quot;I&#039;m female so I must think that porn is for guys and I must dislike it.&quot; What&#039;s WITH that?
Porn for the win! 
(There, I said it.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes little to no sense to me why so many women say that &#8220;porn is disgusting&#8221;, nasty etc. I&#8217;m a woman and I don&#8217;t hate porn. Furthermore, I kind of like watching it. It&#8217;s just sex, albeit graphic, and that&#8217;s it. Unless you&#8217;re a prude or a nun I don&#8217;t see why you should follow the cliche &#8220;I&#8217;m female so I must think that porn is for guys and I must dislike it.&#8221; What&#8217;s WITH that?<br />
Porn for the win!<br />
(There, I said it.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whateverporn.com</title>
		<link>http://www.northbynorthwestern.com/2007/01/1340/why-chicks-dont-dig-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-106709</link>
		<dc:creator>Whateverporn.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 21:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northbynorthwestern.com/2007/01/1340/why-chicks-dont-dig-porn/#comment-106709</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think its that girls don&#039;t like it, I just think guys talk about it more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think its that girls don&#8217;t like it, I just think guys talk about it more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isis</title>
		<link>http://www.northbynorthwestern.com/2007/01/1340/why-chicks-dont-dig-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-100676</link>
		<dc:creator>Isis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northbynorthwestern.com/2007/01/1340/why-chicks-dont-dig-porn/#comment-100676</guid>
		<description>This is a great summation of my feelings on porn!  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great summation of my feelings on porn!  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katy</title>
		<link>http://www.northbynorthwestern.com/2007/01/1340/why-chicks-dont-dig-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-6367</link>
		<dc:creator>Katy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northbynorthwestern.com/2007/01/1340/why-chicks-dont-dig-porn/#comment-6367</guid>
		<description>retro or antique erotica is also an interesting alternative to its graphic modern counterpart - the women have natural bodies, they look like they&#039;re having a lot more fun, and it&#039;s much more provocative because it&#039;s not so blatantly sexual. plus, it&#039;s really funny/interesting to see dildos from the 1800&#039;s or victorian women getting some.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>retro or antique erotica is also an interesting alternative to its graphic modern counterpart &#8211; the women have natural bodies, they look like they&#8217;re having a lot more fun, and it&#8217;s much more provocative because it&#8217;s not so blatantly sexual. plus, it&#8217;s really funny/interesting to see dildos from the 1800&#8217;s or victorian women getting some.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

