Sep. 25, 2008 | 8:00 am

NU committee proposes complete overhaul of campus

A map from the Campus Framework Plan, which proposes changes across campus.

The university released “probably the biggest” long-term plan in its history Thursday, proposing to tear down prominent dorms and buildings for new structures and reshape the lakefill, to be completed over the next 50 years.

The Campus Framework Plan, proposed by a university-wide committee of students, faculty and staff, calls for the demolition of a large portion of campus, including five fraternity houses on North Campus, the Foster-Walker Complex, Sargent Hall, Bobb-McCulloch Hall, the Frances Searle Building and the South Campus parking deck. The lakefill-enclosed pond would become smaller to make way for new buildings.

The changes would bring “more cohesion, harmony and functionality” to campus over the coming decades, said James Webster, a School of Communication professor and member of the Campus Planning Advisory Committee.

The plan would also remove parking lots from the center of campus, open up green space and “take advantage of the proximity to the lake” while preserving “certain sacred spaces that everybody is devoted to,” Webster said. It envisions building sites that could accommodate as much as 7.46 million gross square feet of additional space in the coming decades.

The draft does not address specific timing or the cost of the recommended changes. Starting next week, the proposal will circulate around the Northwestern and Evanston communities for an open discussion in order for the committee to finalize it later this year. It will then be sent to the university administration for consideration and evaluation.

“We don’t want this to be a straitjacket; we want it to be a vision, a framework that allows a good deal of flexibility, some degree of freedom,” Webster added. “And it is a vision that, if we buy into it, will unfold over several decades.”

A key part of the plan is the restoration of the “historic crescent” of open space bordering Harris Hall, University Hall and Deering Meadow. Lunt Hall would move farther south to consolidate the academic departments in a new Social Sciences Quad. A new crescent that curves around the pond toward Lake Michigan would provide more green space while managing pedestrian traffic more efficiently. A bridge would connect the Norris University Center with the University Library to create a physical and social hub on campus — what planners describe as a “great civic square.”

But the plan also maintains areas that have formed the identity of the university — University Hall, Annie May Swift Hall, Harris Hall and the oak grove — Webster said.

“This campus has very few really old historically significant buildings,” he said. “Because we have so few historic buildings of character, we have to preserve them.”

A map from the plan illustrates the proposed crescents of open space.

The southwestern area of campus along Clark Street would be redeveloped to include a residential district, which Webster said would create “a live interface with the city.”

The committee consulted with the architecture firm Sasaki Associates during the 18-month planning phase. “In a university setting, where expansion occurs over many years, it’s essential to have this type of framework,” said Ricardo Dumont, Sasaki’s principal, in a statement. “We’re not suggesting all of this should be built. We are saying, consider future growth as an opportunity to strengthen what you already have,” he added.

“It sort of has to get into our DNA that this is what we want our campus to be.”

“As we build out the campus, as we inevitably will do, we are going to do so consistent with the concept of how we ought to grow the campus and not have a mish-mash of buildings here and there,” Webster said, adding that so far the Northwestern community has been built piece-by-piece without big-picture planning.

”Because we have this limited footprint and because we continue to build, we just can’t continue to do so without some sort of a master plan about where things ought to go and what things in the fullness of time ought to be removed,” he added.

Students are invited to look over the plan and send in their thoughts via e-mail, the university said.

The university will give three presentations to the Northwestern community in McCormick Auditorium at Norris and will be held at 7 p.m. Sept. 30, and at noon and 5:30 p.m. Oct. 1.

Be the first to know what’s going on around campus: Join our breaking news listserv, and we’ll e-mail you as soon as top stories go up on the site.

Contact the author | | | Share

7 Comments »

  1. Skeptical said,

    September 25, 2008 @ 10:59 am

    A plan like this is going to cost tons of money (which we’ll have to pay in tuition increases). It’ll inconvenience students (who have to put up with the construction) and professors (who have to move their offices). What’s the new campus going to add that’s worth all the trouble?

    Plus, I don’t want my dorm torn down!

  2. Unenthused said,

    September 25, 2008 @ 1:06 pm

    This nightmarish plan calls for the demolition of several places of Northwestern history and tradition. This is sad to see and would be unfortunate for alumni who return to campus and find it hard to recognize their old stomping grounds. I am also not pumped to support a plan that tears up a campus the University has just spent hundreds of thousands if not more to remodel, re-landscape, and refurbish with more of my money. Quit while you’re ahead NU… but no hard feelings if you insist on tearing down plex.

  3. Not Happy said,

    September 25, 2008 @ 3:45 pm

    Seriously? If you’re going to do any outrageous renovations, start by tearing down Norris and the Library. Frances Searle is a brand new building, and there’s nothing wrong with any of the dorms/res colleges you plan on demolishing.

  4. wow said,

    September 25, 2008 @ 7:57 pm

    Nice to see NU is training such good little future condo commandos

  5. Hmm said,

    September 25, 2008 @ 9:36 pm

    Yay for tearing down Plex and Frances Searle. Worst designing ever. Did anyone else ever notice how in plex rooms there is one “real” wall and one “fake” wall. The “fake” wall often moves ever so slightly when people on the hall close their doors really hard. It looks like it was placed in as an after thought. And don’t get me started on FS, did the designer ever hear of windows? Brutalist architecture is sooo 1980. Or something. I’d just like not to feel like I’m in a bunker when I’m in class.

    Announcing plans for permanent construction over the next 50 years though might seriously deter enrollment. Who wants to suffer through loud, inconvenient disturbances to campus life for all four years they are here?

  6. Lowbass said,

    September 26, 2008 @ 12:36 am

    Problem is, there is next to nowhere for the campus to go. So we must tear down and rebuild - and from the current status of things, it can only improve the surroundings if we do so. Why on earth is a parking garage squatting on the most scenic spot on campus overlooking the Chicago skyline?!? With so many historical errors in designing the current spaces, it only makes sense to have a good plan to correct all this in the years to come. Expensive? Yes - but rest assured, it will come from donors wanting their name on a new building, and not hit tuition to any significant degree as some might think.

  7. ... said,

    September 27, 2008 @ 12:22 pm

    Who drew that map? The proportions are WAY off.

RSS feed for comments on this post

Leave a Comment