Opinion
Politics / Nov. 6, 2008 at 11:17 pm

Objectivity vanishes in Obama’s press pit

By Jessi Knowles
(Above) Jesse Jackson broke down on election night, but so did many reporters. (Below) Backstage in the press tent. Photos by Jessi Knowles / North by Northwestern.

When Barack Obama was named the next president by a JumboTron-size Wolf Blitzer, the crowd at Grant Park positively thundered with celebration. That was to be expected. What I didn’t expect was that half of the hard-nosed journalists around me would also simultaneously burst into tears of joy.

In the days leading up to the election, I practiced my poker face religiously. I’d miraculously gotten press passes when the news station I’d interned at in South Africa for my journalism residency announced it was coming to the U.S. to cover the election. Excited as I was, I dreaded letting a hint of emotion shine through on Election Day — I’d be denounced by the more-weathered reporters, ejected from the press box as a fraud.

I shouldn’t have worried.

All forms of bias showed through on Tuesday night. Journalists whooped and hollered when Obama won Pennsylvania. They wore “Change” pins on their jackets. They took pictures of Obama’s acceptance speech with their phones like preteen girls at a Hannah Montana concert.

Whatever emotion I was afraid of showing was replaced by something unexpected: utter bewilderment.

If there’s anything that I’ve learned in three and a half years of Medill classes, it’s that unbiased reporting is next to godliness. Journalism professors intone time and time again that personal opinion needs to be sacrificed for something called “truth.” When I was a freshmen, this sounded like a small price to pay.

Now in the middle of my senior year, this presidential campaign has made me realize what I’ve actually signed up for. I can’t wear candidate buttons. I can’t make campaign donations. I can’t even put a damn sign in my window.

It’s been a painful reeducation process: Journalism ideals demand that I switch off the part of myself that harbors a personal opinion. In a Medillian utopia, I can’t prefer peanut butter to jelly, let alone Obama to McCain.

It didn’t become apparent how difficult this would be until I tried to apply classroom theory to the real world. My first taste of real unbiased reporting came during a stint at a major news company in Washington D.C. this past summer. My first week on the job, I was sent to a political rally for Michelle Obama at an upscale hotel. When she walked onto the stage, the room erupted with applause. I lifted my hands to clap (it’s what everyone in the room was doing!) when I noticed all the reporters in the press box giving me dirty looks.

I had to sit on my hands for the rest of the event. It made taking notes difficult.

It took months of practice, but I eventually learned to talk politics without saying the word “I.” Not surprisingly, my incredibly political relatives gave up talking to me at family dinners. I had become a dispassionate robot that only spewed facts and numbers. My mother wondered aloud if I’d secretly switched political affiliations while at college.

I felt increasingly conflicted leading up to November 4th. The day before Election Day, I had a minor crisis of conviction, one of those “What am I doing with my life?” moments. I’m not sure what brought it on. Maybe it was all the Obama shirts on campus. On the verge of a meltdown, I burst into my roommate’s room.

“Am I doing enough for democracy?!” I shouted.

My roommate was fresh from canvassing all weekend in Ohio, three Obama stickers pressed to her vest. She looked at me like I was an idiot.

“Free press is incredibly important for democracy,” she said without hesitation.

And with that sentiment in my back pocket, I headed down to Grant Park.

It stuck with me until Pennsylvania went blue. That’s when I first heard sounds in the press section. Sounds of happiness. Forbidden sounds.

With battleground states quickly falling to Obama, the jubilant feeling from the crowd was infectious, and many of my fellow reporters seemed to have caught the bug. They pumped their fists in the air. They shouted. They cried. I was so surprised I could only gape.

But the surprise quickly dissolved into relief. Watching the blubbering reporters around me, I realized that journalists aren’t robots concerned only with the truth. They’re human too, and try as they might, they can’t just switch off the opinion part of their brain. The press corral on Tuesday night was definitely Obamaland, and when he won, the journalists wanted to celebrate, too.

Which isn’t to say that I approve of the reporters’ victory dance. Yes, what we learn in the classroom obviously gets bent in the newsroom. But the credibility of all journalists relies on the illusion that we’re impartial. “No bias” is just a smoke screen journalists hide behind to gain authority for the facts they report. When journalists let their masks slip, they’re not doing their jobs. And when they’re not doing their jobs, people don’t know who to trust.

I’m disappointed that some reporters at Grant Park couldn’t constrain themselves until they got home. But then again, I waited until the safe confines of my apartment before letting my emotions loose. And you know what? It was kind of lonely.

Also on NBN

The incredible sights and sounds of Obama's rally. Or you can return home.

Comments

  1. NBN is becoming focused only towards medill students. How are stories like this relevant to anyone else on campus?

    anon

    November 7, 2008 at 12:29 am

  2. I wonder if these members of the press who are so obviously in love with Obama will bother to be critical whatsoever of his administration when it screws up…

    Aaron

    November 7, 2008 at 2:48 am

  3. What exactly does the Jesse Jackson photo have to do with the story?

    Jeff

    November 7, 2008 at 3:18 am

  4. I’m surprised that YOU were surprised that journalists were crying and showing emotion. There’s been a very obvious pro-Obama bias in the media in all of the election coverage in the past two years. I’m going to be surprised if they’re even willing to be critical of his administration when problems arise. I know you can’t always be unbiased, everyone has an opinion, but it seems like most people weren’t really even trying.

    Anna

    November 7, 2008 at 3:43 am

  5. I think we would all be better off if journalists were just upfront about their biases instead of thinking the public is too stupid to know they have them. It comes off as condescending and laughable, quit frankly. And is why I didn’t choose journalism school. I don’t need robot training, thank you very much.

    Kaitlyn

    November 7, 2008 at 9:19 am

  6. Great story, Jessi. It is impossible to be completely objective if you’re human, so I sympathize with how hard most journalists work to be as objective as possible. I actually think that a large part of that spontaneous joy was not political, but it had to do with a monumental barrier being broken, not so much the fact that a Democrat was elected. That makes it a little different. Condoleeza Rice said herself that Obama’s election was inspirational.

    Joan

    November 7, 2008 at 10:14 am

  7. In response to the first post, I found this article very interesting, though I am not a Medill student. I don’t really know much about the press, and it was interesting to see an insider’s view.

    other anon

    November 7, 2008 at 6:45 pm

  8. I also found the article to be interesting…something most of us don’t think about everyday.

    engineering student

    November 8, 2008 at 6:53 am

  9. the job of a journalist is to report on reality

    hypothetically, if the candidates were hitler and jesus, the journalist wouldn’t be doing a very good job if he/she reported that each would be equally good for the country…

    the important thing is to report all the relevant facts truthfully
    opinions should be based on the facts, not the other way around

    cs major

    November 17, 2008 at 2:43 am

Leave a Comment