Separating religion from extremism
I’ve always been an outspoken supporter of the LGBT community. So when I heard that the infamous Westboro Baptist Church was going to be protesting my high school’s Gay-Straight Alliance, I immediately felt my bleeding heart senses tingling. I checked the Facebook group my friend created for a counter-protest, sad that I could only be there in spirit, and read the comments. They were pretty predictable — a lot of outrage, a lot of promises to stand up to such a deplorable act. But one in particular stood out to me.
“I will be there I hate overly religious people so I will definitely come.”
Not only was it a poorly constructed run-on, but this kid’s reasoning struck a nerve. Okay, I thought, I’m not a huge fan of religion either, but I would never protest people for simply possessing an organized belief system (if this were only what the issue were about). Furthermore, wasn’t this supposed to be about LGBT support? Conflating these two ideas seemed to demean the whole point of protesting these people. This kid didn’t know his enemy. It’s not the institution of organized religion — it’s extremism masquerading as God’s word.
If you’ve heard of the Westboro Baptist Church, you’ll know that it’s not a religious institution — it’s a bona fide hate group and should be treated as such. They’re the ones who proliferate intolerance across the country by picketing military funerals and standing outside synagogues telling Jewish people that God hates them.
Any organization whose domain name is godhatesfags isn’t real religion — it’s pure hate. And anyone who says otherwise is a downright bigot. We have to realize that hate isn’t a prerequisite for any faith. When it’s been bastardized to the point of absolute intolerance or lethal violence, it’s no longer religion, it’s just plain extremism. But differentiating between the two will help us to understand against whom we should really be fighting.
The commenter on the message board isn’t the only one guilty of immediately linking religion with fanaticism. The conflation of religion with extremism has recently been highlighted in the Fort Hood shootings in Texas. The sheer horror and tragedy of the killings is being lost in the midst of arguing about whether the shooter, Major Nidal Malik Hasan, was a Muslim. One thing to bear in mind is that there is the broader idea of terrorism that Americans have become accustomed to (e.g. Al Qaeda), and then there are individual acts of terrorism. Being Muslim certainly isn’t a terrorist prerequisite. Timothy McVeigh, a US Army veteran, committed one of the most horrific acts of domestic terrorism in modern American history when he bombed the Alfred P. Murrah Building in Oklahoma City in 1995. In modern times, though, terrorists are automatically associated with Islam and vice versa.
Any evidence that shows that Hasan murdered 13 innocent people in the name of Islam has to be countered with the undeniable fact that if he did, he was not honoring Islam by any means. This fervor is now just detracting from the tragedy, and Muslims groups are being forced to condemn what they already know is horrendous. Organizations such as the Council on American-Islamic Relations immediately released statements denouncing the acts.
“I believe it’s most important to make note that the Muslim community responded [...] appropriately to condemn and contrast the shooter’s actions from how Muslims live in accordance to Islam,” wrote Gerald Hankerson, Outreach Director of CAIR-Chicago, in an e-mail. “The support coming from interfaith and social service groups for the Muslim community and organizations testifies that American Muslims have reached out to share [...] how they live in this nation with our neighbors and fellow citizens. Verily, both Muslims and the American public should do more and continue working to sincerely engage our communities and dispel falsehoods, alleviate alienating communities and cease double standards in unveiling truths so our nation’s peace and security will prevail, further influencing hearts and minds abroad.”
Organizations like Westboro Baptist Church and people like Nidal Malik Hasan make it difficult for those already skeptical of religion to remember to separate the good from the outrageous and extreme. I’d be lying if I said I didn’t have an urge to punch the crap out of everyone who showed up outside my school with a “God Hates Fags” sweatshirt. But then I remember that these people don’t represent Christianity and they should be ashamed to call themselves Christian. If we want to make the strongest case against acts of extremism, we have to target the right people in the right way.
| Print
Read about a religious experience at Northwestern. Or you can return home.
Agreed. Well said.
Here here!
November 13, 2009 at 12:11 am
Also agreed. Very well said.
Second the motion
November 13, 2009 at 3:15 am
Very well-stated and to the point. I’m Catholic, and I hate it when people do terrible things in the name of “religion.” God is love. When you don’t honor that, you’re not honoring him or your religion.
Nicki
November 13, 2009 at 6:41 pm
Please you are a young sheltered crybaby who think everything is entitled to you you probably got trophy’s with out earning them and was told every one is equal and barely even know what real sexuality
is. just enjoy your youth and as time goes by you will be wise and know
who you are .Just because people believe in the LORD CHRIST WERE NOT BIGOT OR CLOSE MINDED IN FACT WERE MORE LOVING AND UNDERSTANDING
AGUSTIN q
November 13, 2009 at 8:33 pm
What happened in Texas is a terrorist act no other religion acts in this type of manner and its true. You don’t hear buddhist ,Christians,Hindu
and native americans and other religions act this way in this day of age so stop kidding your self
AGUSTIN q
November 13, 2009 at 8:54 pm
agustin q, it’s very difficult to understand exactly what your point is.
uhm.
November 13, 2009 at 9:22 pm
Agustin Q, Jews fought wars as a nation in the biblical times of David, Solomon, and etc. Catholics/Christians led the crusades.
I think you are the one kidding yourself: throughout history, fanatics of all faiths have distorted the purposes of religion (centrally, hope, love and faith) to serve their own violent purposes. It is an unfair reflection on the whole group to make such broad conclusions based on the actions of one individual.
Untrue...
November 13, 2009 at 11:53 pm
Dear AUSTIN q,
You are clearly an idiot. First, you call her a sheltered crybaby. Then, you question her intelligence and make assumptions. Finally, once you’ve made yourself into a complete asshole, you advocate for Jesus Christ and yell in all caps about how you are loving and understanding and not closed minded. If you want to promote Christianity, then do so with dignity and respect and don’t be a hypocrite. People like you make me sick.
– Zorro
Zorro
November 14, 2009 at 4:30 am
He’s posted on some other articles and is clearly dumb as shit. And he’s clearly wrong. Other religions definitely do commit some atrocities around the world as well (see Hindu violence in Orissa, Jewish violence in Israel/Palestine, and Christian violence in Rwanda and Bosnia) Frankly, religion isn’t the culprit here. The violence stems from specific groups and people who want there to be violence in the world.
Agustin Q also doesn’t understand what “sheltered” means. He’s probably actually a 9th grader.
Ignore Agustin Q
November 14, 2009 at 3:18 pm
I am in complete agreement with this article.
And Austin Q, I’m astonished by you. It’s almost funny how closed-minded and misinformed you are. But then again, it’s not funny. It’s a little bit scary.
Amused
November 14, 2009 at 8:29 pm
Oops. Augustin**
Amused
November 14, 2009 at 8:29 pm